Connect with us


The law that explains why Turkey can’t search the Saudi consulate for Khashoggi



A security staff member guards the entrance of the Saudi Arabian consulate in Istanbul. (Yasin Akgul / AFP/Getty Images)

More than a week ago, Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi stepped inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to pick up some paperwork. His fiancee says he never came out.

Turkish officials have said that the journalist was killed inside and dismembered by a “murder squad,” flown in from the kingdom for this express task. Some sources have suggested that Turkish officials managed to collect audio or video evidence capturing the moment of Khashoggi’s death.

But so far, they have declined to search the consulate or arrests any Saudi officials. That’s because of a set of international laws governing how host countries behave toward their embassies.

Embassies and consulates occupy a curious space. Though they live on land belonging to their host nation, the 1961 Vienna Convention on Consular Affairs lays out really clear rules for how a host country can behave. Under international law, police and security officials cannot enter an embassy without the express permission of the embassy ambassador. Consular bags — special pouches that require a seal and can contain private paperwork, communications or other goods from the diplomatic embassy, consulate or consulate residence — are not to be opened by the host nation.

The convention also requires missions to respect local laws, and embassies are expected to stay out of host nations’ internal affairs. Host nations do have the authority to revoke consular clearances for embassy staff and can revoke their immunity, effectively forcing them to leave. Countries follow these rules because of the “rule of inviolability” — they want their embassies and consulates treated fairly, and the only way to guarantee that is to follow these rules when they’re hosting diplomatic missions.

These rules — and arguments about what they really mean — have played a key role in several diplomatic crises over the years.

Soon after WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange took refuge in Ecuador’s embassy in London, British officials floated the idea of forcing entry into the building to seize him. (An arrest warrant had been issued.) The British Foreign Officer argued that it had the right to revoke the embassy’s diplomatic status under the country’s Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act, passed in 1987.

That rule was passed in the wake of the murder of Yvonne Fletcher, a British police officer who was shot in 1984 while monitoring an anti-Moammar Gaddafi protest outside the Libyan Embassy. The gun that killed her was fired from within the embassy, though the killer was never identified. In the days that followed, British forces seized the embassy, expelled those inside, and severed relations with Libya.

Ecuador, however, argued that revoking diplomatic status would be a major violation of its autonomy.

Credit:Washington Post

Continue Reading

Most Read